Of you your longform three stages to resolve model collisions, "shared mental models as a lens to examine the interactions" seems very promising. Making cross-team activities (meetings, weekly reports, training, ...) optional is one way to assess the value of each. This does carry risk. Safer - quietly tracking rescheduled, cancelled, or poorly attended activities. These, in a group , could provide clues to divergent mental models.
Not wild about extended single sentence paragraphing, regardless of its name. Feels a bit powerpointy, which admittedly does have utility at times. The classic paragraph style: topic, support:logic, conclusion still works well for long form. With occasional departure, for impact.
Of you your longform three stages to resolve model collisions, "shared mental models as a lens to examine the interactions" seems very promising. Making cross-team activities (meetings, weekly reports, training, ...) optional is one way to assess the value of each. This does carry risk. Safer - quietly tracking rescheduled, cancelled, or poorly attended activities. These, in a group , could provide clues to divergent mental models.
Not wild about extended single sentence paragraphing, regardless of its name. Feels a bit powerpointy, which admittedly does have utility at times. The classic paragraph style: topic, support:logic, conclusion still works well for long form. With occasional departure, for impact.